Comments on: Is TPACK fundamentally flawed? A quick response

By: TPACK Newsletter, Issue #12, October 2012 | Punya Mishra's Web

TPACK Newsletter, Issue #12, October 2012 | Punya Mishra's Web — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:46:45 +0000

[...] Mishra, P. (2012, January 24). Is TPACK fundamentally flawed? A quick response. [Web log post] . Retrieved from http://punya.educ.msu.edu/2012/01/24/is-tpack-fundamentally-flawed-a-quick-response/ [...]

By: Mary Ann Reilly

Mary Ann Reilly — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:20:39 +0000

Curious as to how the idea of community as curriculum relates to TPACK. IF knowledge is not an “in the head” matter, but rather that which is constructed among and across many heads, the how does that influence the model?

By: TPACK and the fallacy of integration, wicked problems and protean technology < Richard Olsen's Blog

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:59:30 +0000

[...] Punya Mishra commented on my concerns about the TPACK Framework, and even more surprised with his comment that he mostly agreed with me. Punya suggested I read the handbook chapter on TPACK to get a [...]

By: Petra

Petra — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:21:54 +0000

Hi Punya,
The debate about TPACK seems to go in the direction that Richard is describing. And yes, from survey-research we see that the different components of TPACK cannot be separated that easily. And probably we should not attempt to try. But I strongly believe that the TPACK framework is someting – as you mention – that could help teachers (and educational designers!) when they have to start (re-) thinking about their education. And my believe is based upon actual experiences with teachers and educational designers Transforming this believe into a scientific paper is something that we are working on..!
Petra